Tuesday, June 21, 2022

Corpus Christi Procession - Saint Clement - Ottawa On, June 19 2022

I don't have any photos of the procession which I know was sacred and beautiful. However, I did take a few pictures of the inside of Saint Clement Church a few months ago when I went to mass with Madeleine, Maryke, and Lorraine before participating in the Rosary Convoy on Parliament Hill







Thank you to the Priests of St. Clement

This is from the bulletin 

Corpus Christi Procession Sunday June 19th At the 10:30 Mass, in conjunction with our First Holy Communion. BBQ & refreshments served under the tent. Procession de la Fête-Dieu le dimanche 19 juin 

À la messe de 10h30, en même temps que les premières communions. BBQ et rafraîchissements servis sous la tente.

From Madeleine Lafleur

St. Clément with hundreds of parishioners processed down four streets and went to a nearby park, and said some prayers in the kiosk at the top of the hill with  Alleluia, praise the Lord!


Corpus Christi Procession Saint-Grégoire-de-Nazianze Church in Vankleek Hill, June 19, 2022

Article and photos by n

https://thereview.ca/2022/06/20/saint-gregoire-de-nazianze-church-celebrates-feast-of-corpus-christi/

Parishioners at Saint-Grégoire-de-Nazianze Church in Vankleek Hill celebrated mass in the church at 10 a.m. on Sunday, June 19, before proceeding shortly after 11 a.m. with a procession through the streets around the church. 

Parishioners of Saint-Grégoire-de-Nazianze Church in Vankleek Hill commemorated the 225th anniversary of Vankleek Hill, on Sunday, June 19, by celebrating the Feast of Corpus Christi publicly and solemnly, as their forefathers did during the 50s, 60s and 70s.

A type of celebration that dates back to the second half of the thirteenth century, Corpus Christi is primarily a Roman Catholic festival, but it is also acknowledged in the calendar of a few Anglican churches and celebrated by some Western Rite Orthodox Christians. Corpus Christi means the Body of Christ and refers to the Holy Communion, Last Supper or Lord’s Supper. It honors the body of Jesus Christ in the Eucharist.


Years ago, this feast was presided over by an archbishop, followed by priests, deacons and members of various parish groups like school children, Knights of Columbus, Optimist Club members, etc. The festival of Corpus Christi gave rise in many places to a procession, during which the priest carried the Eucharist, on display in a parade through the streets, then taken to a home which had been decorated with banners and flowers. The procession would proceed with parishioners praying and singing hymns.

Parishioners at Saint-Grégoire-de-Nazianze Church in Vankleek Hill celebrated mass in the church at 10 a.m. before proceeding shortly after 11 a.m. with a procession through the streets around the church. The procession ended at 154 Higginson Street, where a temporary altar, decorated with candles, flowers and various decorative objects was installed at a parishioner’s home, where the procession paused to pray and sing hymns.

Photos by Reid Mason




Corpus Christi Procession 2022 - St. Mary’s Parish, Ottawa

Thank you Father Mark Goring and God bless you!
 


Corpus Christi Procession 2022 - Cathedral of the Holy Rosary- Vancouver B.C

 Thank you Archbishop Miller











Sunday, June 19, 2022

Corpus Christi Procession - June 19, 2022 - St. Patrick Basilica. Ottawa, ON, Canada

June is the month of the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus

Every year in June, Catholics worldwide celebrate the most beautiful Feast
of Corpus Christi, the Solemnity of the Body and Blood Soul and Divinity
of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Viva Cristo Rey!


Photos by Pat 










Member of Our Lady of Victory Praesidium  ( and me )




Emmanuel, photographer for the Knights of Columbus
Click here for Emmanuel's website







Barbara Pat and me having breakfast  earlier in the morning



Monday, June 6, 2022

Run With Life: I would really like you all to ask him that question

The way Justin Trudeau treats Canadians is heartless and just plain mean. He hasn't a clue. 

Run With Life: I would really like you all to ask him that question: This is a very important news conference given by MP Cathay Wagantall. What a gracious and beautiful person she is.  Far more gracious than ...

Saturday, June 4, 2022

The Golden Arrow Pilgrimage, Saturday, June 4, 2022

Some photos I took
( videos below )

We gathered at the War Memorial  (below) 
with opening prayers led by John Pacheco


Procession to Parliament Hill


Praying on Parliament Hill





Videos

At the War Memorial

Opening prayer to God the Father 
John Pacheco

Prayer to Saint Michael the Archangel / O Canada


Procession to Parliament Hill


Parliament Hill


Litany to Saint Joseph


Pat leading a decade of the rosary

Rosary / Joyful mysteries




Run With Life: I would really like you all to ask him that question

Run With Life: I would really like you all to ask him that question: This is a very important news conference given by MP Cathay Wagantall. What a gracious and beautiful person she is.  Far more gracious than ...

Monday, May 30, 2022

Come Holy Spirit

The History of the Charismatic Renewal in Canada

CCHA, Study Sessions, 50 (1983) 307-324

The Nature and History of the

Catholic Charismatic Renewal in Canada

 

by James HANRAHAN, C.S.B.

St. Thomas More College, Saskatoon

In approaching this subject I am acutely aware of certain difficulties.  

First, is the intrinsic difficulty of writing about a movement of the Holy Spirit. After all, we have the word of Jesus The Wind blows wherever it pleases; you hear its sound, but you can not tell where 'it comes from or where it is going. That is how it is with all who are born of the Spirit. (John 3:8)

Second, there is the difficulty, in treating development as recent as the charismatic renewal, of finding the needed perspective. One may look, say, at the spirituality of the seventeenth century and
have some confidence that one can see the movement of the Spirit through several generations, but here we are looking only at the past fifteen years. 

Third, it must be noted that our subject is not located in one place, as, say, Ste. Anne de Beaupré, nor can we draw on any clearly defined body of material. The renewal spans the country and is largely unrecorded except in the memories of those involved. 

Fourth, I have a special difficulty in that I must write as one who has been and is still actively involved. I know that this places particular demands on me to exercise care in using evidence and in presenting my analysis. At the same time, I think it can also be seen as an advantage; one not involved could also find problems.

What we are looking at is the charismatic renewal as it has developed in the Catholic Church in Canada. The background of this may be found in the Pentecostal Movement, which is generally seen as having started on January 1, 1901, with an experience of the power of the Holy Spirit in a bible school in Topeka, Kansas, conducted by Rev. Charles F. Parham. 

 A closer background is found in the Neo-Pentecostal or Charismatic Movement that grew up in many of the mainline Protestant Churches after starting in the Anglican Church in Van Nuys, California in 1960. Both of these movements existed in Canada before developments in the Catholic Church began. The Catholic Charismatic renewal started in the United States at a prayer and study weekend held at Duquesne University in Pittsburgh in February 1967. It spread almost at once to Notre Dame University and quickly then, more broadly.  

The beginning of the charismatic renewal in the Catholic Church in Canada can probably best be said to have taken place in Combermere, Ontario, on August 20-21, 1968. Certainly there were individual  Canadian Catholics who had experienced the power of the Spirit in the renewal before that time, but this seems to have been the first group experience that was to lead to further developments. For those two days a number of people from Ann Arbor, Michigan, including Steve Clark and Jim Cavnar, visited Madonna House in Combermere.  They spoke about the action of the Holy Spirit in the United States as they had witnessed and shared in it since early 1967, and they prayed over many in the Combermere community.

Catherine Doherty, the remarkable woman who was the principal foundress of Madonna House, had long felt a lack in the Latin Church and especially in North America of the deep awareness of the role of the Holy Spirit found in the Eastern tradition of her youth. When the first reports of the charismatic renewal began to appear in May 1967, she was very interested. Early in 1968 she opened contacts with some of the leaders and asked Bishop J.R. Windle whether he would approve of her inviting them to Combermere. He agreed readily and arrangements were made.  Those who were present in Combermere for those days of teaching and prayer agree that it was a wonderful experience. They felt the power of the Spirit and the presence of Christ in a new way. They prayed in tongues and rejoiced to receive the Holy Spirit's gifts. And this was not just an experience of a couple of days; it stayed with them and became a normal and accepted part of their life. This charismatic experience, appropriately called, in scriptural language, "the baptism in the Holy Spirit" or, to avoid confusion with the Sacrament of Baptism, "the release of the Holy Spirit", is central to the charismatic renewal. 

The experience is practically always described in terms of an awareness of the presence of Christ, but the ways in which this is felt and its effects of it vary so greatly that the total experience may be said to be unique to each individual. Awe, love, joy, peace, an overwhelming power, a sense of forgiveness, acceptance — these and many old similar words recur in people's descriptions of their experience, with many shadings and in varying combinations. 

Some Pentecostal Churches make the gift of tongues a sort of test of true baptism in the Holy Spirit, but in the Catholic experience, the effects are much more varied. Prayer in tongues is quite commonly found but such effects as peace of soul in the face of troubles, a hunger for and a new understanding of Scripture, a deeper appreciation of the sacraments, conversion of life, and others are also often experienced and are seen as signs of the Spirit's action. 

In Combermere, many members of Madonna House found in this experience precisely the sort of unity with the others that Catherine Doherty had long been calling for among them, and in this unity they experienced also a new openness to others and an ability to exercise their ministries and use their gifts which they had not known before. Catherine encouraged them, but always in relation to the main purpose of Madonna House in service. The prayer life of the community was affected, especially by the use of healing prayer. In their common prayer, however, since not everyone had taken up the charismatic forms, they were careful to maintain the bond of peace and did not use tongues as a normal part of their worship.

From 1968 to 1980 there was a Sunday evening prayer meeting at Madonna House. Some of the staff participated, but this was not really a continuing prayer group; rather it was a service offered to guests at the house. In 1980, they re-examined the place of the prayer meeting in their life and decided to drop it. It had never been central for the members of the community at Madonna House and its dropping did not mean a turning away from the charismatic experience which remains part of their life. 

A significant distinction may be useful here. What can be seen at Combermere is a prolonged series of prayer meetings without the establishment of a prayer group. The meeting was an apostolic undertaking of Madonna House offered to the guests who came there. The guests, coming and going, could benefit from the meetings, but they could not form a lasting group. That development, which would be so characteristic of the charismatic renewal, was still to come. 

Madonna House never undertook any sort of systematic outreach in the charismatic renewal. Some members, however, notably Fathers Robert Wild and Francis Martin, have made significant contributions through their writings. 

And the initiative of one man provided the spark for the development of prayer groups elsewhere in Canada. Among those for whom the visit of the people from Ann Arbor was a decisive moment was Father Jim Duffy. In October 1968, he was sent to Marian Centre in Regina, and he went with the resolve that if he could find six people who wanted to pray he would get a prayer group started. 

The staff at the Marian Centre were very busy. There could be no thought of gathering them into a weekly charismatic prayer group. Father Duffy pondered and prayed. On January 1, 1969, he gathered three other members of the staff plus a visiting priest for a first private meeting. There was a genuine desire among them for a session like that in Madonna House the previous summer, and afterward, there was agreement that another meeting should be held, but they were uncertain as to when this should be and decided to leave it up to the Holy Spirit. Actually, the next meeting was not held until May 24, the Vigil of Pentecost. 

Again it was a private meeting, that is, held without any open announcement or general invitation, but this time there were seven people there — Father Duffy had found his six others — and there was common agreement that another meeting should be held the next week and that it should be an open meeting at the Catholic Centre in Regina. 

On June 8, 1969, then, nineteen people gathered at the Catholic Centre for the first open prayer meeting in Regina. Father Duffy explained the nature of such a meeting and they went on to pray and praise the Lord, with moments of silence and readings from Scripture. During the meeting, Father Duffy asked the Lord to give a sign to show that these meetings were in accordance with his will. Later in the week, when the staff of the Marian Centre was on retreat, he felt moved to pray with one of them who then experienced the gift of tongues. This was at once seen as the sign that had been asked for. 

The group went on meeting week by week and grew slowly both in numbers and in the manifestation of gifts. They began to pray in tongues, then to sing praise in tongues, to speak in tongues with an interpretation, to pray for healing, and to experience it.  One of the aspects of any prayer group is the need to develop a committed nucleus that can carry the group through difficult times and provide a basis for growth. We can see this happening in Regina. During the first eight weeks (June 8 to August 3) forty-five names were recorded as having taken part in the group; of those, ten had attended at least four meetings. In eight weeks, in the spring (February 8 to March 29), sixty-five names were recorded and twenty people were there at least four times. 

The Madonna House community at Marian Centre helped to get the group started. Of the ten regulars during the first eight weeks, five were from there. But in order to take on a life of its own, the group had to develop its own nucleus, and it did. Only Father Duffy and one other from Marian Centre were among the regulars in the later eight weeks, and the other was not one of those who had been there at the start. The people from Madonna House were, of course, subject to transfer to new appointments; they also found it necessary, once the group got going, to limit their attendance in order to take care of other concerns of Marian Centre. On the other hand, four of the five regulars who were not from Marian Centre were still among the twenty regulars in the spring. By the spring the group had found its identity. 

At the end of January, they had decided to establish a core group of about twelve people. The meeting of February 8 was the first at which the core acted as a team, and that marked the real beginning of growth. In the previous eight weeks, the average size of a meeting had been just twelve, lower than the summer before; the eight weeks beginning February 8 averaged twenty-six, and the weeks after that jumped to about sixty. 

By the time Father Duffy was transferred from Regina to the West Indies in the fall of 1970, the group in Regina was well established. Well before that, the renewal had begun to spread. In early July 1969, when the Regina group was still in its infancy, Father Duffy went to Edmonton to give a retreat which soon became a charismatic experience. By the fall, a group was starting up at the Oblate Fathers' retreat house at St. Albert, north of Edmonton. This was charismatic but somewhat muted in character, perhaps because of its situation. It closed down in 1970. 

Other groups started up and folded, but always started up again. By the summer of 1971, it was clear that the renewal was established in Edmonton. Opportunities for the spread of the renewal came especially from the work Father Duffy was invited to do with the communities of Sisters. During 1970 he spoke on prayer and conducted prayer days with several particular communities and also with gatherings of Sisters from various groups. He worked with the Precious Blood Sisters, the Sisters of Sion, Sisters of Service, the Grey Nuns, and the St. Joseph Sisters, but most of all with the Sisters of Charity of St. Louis. In December 1969, he was asked to assist at the second session of the Chapter of Renewal of the Sisters of St. Louis at Radville, Saskatchewan. 

Out of this came an invitation for him to conduct a series of prayer days and retreats for the Sisters at centers throughout Western Canada so that all the members of the community could hear him. This was carried out from January to April 1970, and took him to Vancouver and Calgary as well as back to Regina and Radville. Vancouver was especially interesting. 

The charismatic renewal was already underway in Vancouver when Father Duffy went there in February for the first time. It was largely the result of the zeal of Rev. Bernice Girard, Pentecostal chaplain at the University of British Columbia. She had been interested in encouraging the Neo-Pentecostal Movement among Anglicans and others in Vancouver for some time, and when news broke about the beginnings of the Catholic charismatic renewal during the summer of 1967 she was very interested. 

In the spring of 1968, she organized an ecumenical conference of Pentecostals and Neo-Pentecostals to which she invited Kevin Ranaghan from Notre Dame. No lasting Catholic group seems to have come from that, although a number of Catholics began to participate in meetings run by Bernice Girard. A Catholic group started in the summer of 1969 in a bookstore run by Mary Kelly, at the initiative of Sister Barbara Ann Chase who had just come from Seattle to work at catechetics in Vancouver. After some weeks at the store, the group settled at the Cénacle Convent. 

Father Duffy's visits to Vancouver can serve to illustrate the character of the renewal there in early 1970. He went there primarily to see the Sisters of St. Louis but was also swept up in other activities. On the evening he first arrived, February 19, he was taken to one of Bernice Girard's meetings. The next two days were largely taken up with the Sisters. On the 22nd. Sunday, he was on an open line show on radio with Bernice Girard. 

On Monday he was invited to the Precious Blood Sisters, who turned out to be intensely interested in the charismatic renewal. And that evening he was asked to lead a prayer meeting at St. Augustine's parish, conducted by the Oblate Fathers. He found about fifty people there, and a meeting filled with tongues and encouraging prophecy, but he felt they needed some instruction on the baptism in the Holy Spirit and the gifts. His sense of this need may have stemmed in part from his having had supper with the priest recently appointed as Chaplain to the charismatic renewal in Vancouver by a somewhat concerned Archbishop. His second visit, in April, was more of the same. Besides praying with the Sisters, he preached at Frasendew Assembly Church, was on the radio again, was introduced as a Catholic Pentecostal priest, and took part in a prayer meeting at the Cénacle with about twenty-five, mostly young, people.  

This development in Vancouver points to an aspect of the renewal which has provided some of its most remarkable achievements and also some of its striking failures. The charismatic renewal in the Catholic Church owes much to the Pentecostal and Neo-Pentecostal Movements that preceded it. The awareness of this debt and a good deal of shared experience have made possible a deeper ecumenical relationship than is commonly found. This must be seen as of great value and of great hope for the future, as a real sign of the action of the Spirit. But at the same time, it certainly has posed dangers. 

Without a deepening, truly Catholic understanding of the experience, such ecumenical relations can be easily distorted. There have been cases of individuals and even of whole groups of Catholic charismatics abandoning the Church. As Father Duffy perceived, instruction is especially needed in this context. While all this and much more was going on in Western Canada, the renewal was beginning elsewhere in the country as well. In Ontario, outside of Combermere, it is not easy to say with certainty where the first activity was. It may have been in Sault Ste. Marie at St. Mary's College in the fall of 1969. A group of women from there made a retreat in Michigan which turned out to be a sort of Life in the Spirit Seminar. Three of them, shortly after, received the gift of tongues. Wondering what to do, they contacted the retreat master, who put them in touch with a Sister in Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan. With her, they decided to form a prayer group at St. Mary's, where Father Ed O'Reilly, C.S.B. was interested. In the beginning, the group was international in membership and met sometimes in Canada and sometimes in the United  States. 

Then it settled down as simply a Canadian group for some years until recently when it has become international again. Windsor was another place where the beginnings were early, perhaps ahead of Sault Ste. Marie. It was probably the first place where a significant number of Canadian Catholics became involved in the renewal. Ann Arbor was only a few miles away, and there was a large early group at the Gesu parish, the Jesuit church in Detroit. Their influence was soon visible in Windsor, but for quite a while there was little felt the need for a distinct group in Windsor itself. Sometime in 1969, Mr.  and Mrs.  Ed. Heisler began to hold a meeting in their home, the start of a group which, when it outgrew the house and moved to Holy Rosary Church, became known as the John XXIII Group. 

Other groups soon started, at St. Theresa's Church, Holy Redeemer College, Assumption Church, and elsewhere. 19 In Toronto, during the fall, winter, and spring of 1969-70, a number of people who had made one of the Faith and Sharing retreats organized by Jean Vanier, gathered each Friday evening at St. Augustine's Seminary for follow-up sessions of Scripture study and sharing. The combination of this with the influence of the Full Gospel Business Men's Fellowship provided the rather unlikely background for the emergence of two charismatic groups in 1970. 

The sessions at St. Augustine's were usually led by two seminarians, Jim Hanna and Don Lizzotti, who had been to the Full Gospel Business Men's meetings. The others found their style of prayer puzzling but attractive, and some of them also went to the Full Gospel meetings. In May 1970, the organizers of the Vanier sessions decided to suspend operations until September. Some of those who had been attending, however, was unwilling to give up meeting and arranged to continue on Thursday evenings at a private home. By the end of the summer, the meeting, still led by Don Lizzotti, had become a clearly charismatic group and had outgrown the space of a private home. At one meeting they had eighty-five people jammed into every available nook and cranny. Most of them moved to a day nursery run by the Sisters of the Immaculate Conception to become the Emmanuel Prayer Group. After two years that space, too, became too small and the group finally settled in the basement of St. Basil's Church. At the time the move was being made to the day nursery, one couple, Orval and Margaret Mooney, decided that they should try to start a group in their parish, Holy Rosary. This had been in their hearts for some time. Earlier in the year, while the Vanier sessions were still on, they had arranged for Kevin Ranaghan to speak at Holy Rosary and he had encouraged them to think of a parish group that would be specifically Catholic in character. In September they invited Father George Kosicki to help persuade the priests of the parish, his Basilian confreres, that the idea should be accepted. And with Father John Gaughan, then the Treasurer General of the Basilians, they worked out a format for a prayer meeting centered on the Eucharist. 22 From Emmanuel and Holy Rosary many other groups sprang up in the city.  

In Ontario, there was no one figure that played anything like the role that Father Duffy had played in the West. The general picture that emerges from the groups in Sault Ste. Marie, Windsor and Toronto, and many others that could be cited,  are of great variety. This is true everywhere, of course, and it is one of the signs that this really is the work of the Holy Spirit — the Spirit of God deeply respects our human spirits, and when he touches us he does so in precisely the way we need, the way which will best enable us to respond in full freedom, and this can be seen in the development of groups as well as of persons — but it can perhaps be seen best in Ontario. Each group started in its own way, with its own background, and as the renewal spread the various influences balanced and reinforced one another. 

In Quebec, the first French-speaking group was started by Sister Flore Crête in Montreal. A Sister of Providence, she was studying at  Notre Dame in 1967 when the renewal started up there. When she returned home in 1969, she wanted to get a group started. Her superiors objected to her starting one in the motherhouse, so she began in a very small way in her family home. 

Greater impetus came the following year with the return to Quebec of Father Jean-Paul Regimbai, a Trinitarian, who had been introduced to the renewal in Phoenix, Arizona, where he had been sent for reasons of health. A wide-ranging apostolate soon developed from his experience there and his health improved enough that his superior called him home in 1970 and named him Director of a retreat house in Granby, Quebec. He at once began to bring a charismatic influence into the retreats. People were healed, and soon hundreds of people were coming and groups were starting up.

The English-speaking renewal in Quebec started with the arrival of Father Joe Kane, O.M.I., in 1970. Having had some time as a missionary in Peru, he had returned for a break and while taking a refresher course had found the renewal in Seattle, Washington. He was influential in the early development of charismatic activity in Vancouver, 26  then came to Montreal. His work there quickly led to the involvement of other priests, Oblates and diocesan, and the foundation of several groups  

Two features of the renewal in Quebec, which can be seen in these beginning and in later developments, should be mentioned here. One of them is somewhat different from experience elsewhere, while the other is a common feature but especially striking in Quebec. 

The first is the very significant role of priests in the renewal in Quebec. In the beginning, there was controversy. This is hardly surprising. The cultural forms of Pentecostal piety had been alien to Catholics everywhere, but in Quebec, a double sort of translation was needed. There was great sensitivity in Quebec, as the Seventies were beginning, to the threat posed by the dominant English-speaking culture of the continent. The renewal could be seen as part of that threat. And many in the Church were very much aware of the dangers of the vagaries of new doctrines and forms of worship in the Church. For some, Jean-Paul Regimbai embodied these dangers. He was denounced to the Archbishop of Sherbrooke, and while that in itself was soon settled a shadow remained. Here, one might say was the temptation that Ronald Knox had seen as characteristic of movements of religious enthusiasm and experience, which those who had gone through it could only see as the power of God in their lives, was being challenged and questioned by those in authority in the Church, and the temptation was to proclaim the experience by denying the authority. But the response of the leaders of the renewal in Quebec was an ecclesial one. They requested and received permission from Archbishop Paul Grégoire of Montreal to hold a seminar at the Grand Seminary in Montreal, especially for priests and religions to provide them with information about the charismatic renewal, its history, the experience involved, and its developing theology. Called in this way to understanding and to leadership, the priests responded vigorously. Within six months after the sessions held at the beginning of September 1972, the numbers of people involved in the renewal doubled. 

This development is significant especially because one of the important aspects of the renewal has been the effective lay leadership it has called forth. In fact, in the rest of Canada, one of the problems faced by the renewal has been a lack of priests willing to become involved. This has often left people who were hungry for Catholic teaching without any voice able to speak to them in the name of the Church and has sometimes led to a gap between the experience of prayer and the sacramental life of the Church. Priests, on the other hand, have often found it difficult to know how to respond to a lay leadership strong in the experience of prayer, rooted in the word of God and filled with a deep pastoral concern for their groups, but lacking instruction in and understanding of precisely those aspects of the Church's teaching and practice that priests have been taught to emphasize. The relationship between priest and lay leader is a delicate and demanding one on both sides, one which must be founded on deep love and mutual respect. When, as sometimes happens, it turns into a competition for power, this must be seen as a failure. Rather, this relationship needs to be seen as a powerful call of the Holy Spirit to the whole Church to grow in unity and in true community. Such community is not a univocal reality and it is not surprising that the Spirit's call has found a somewhat different response in the Church in Quebec than in the rest of Canada. 

The second aspect of the development of the renewal in Quebec is its rapid growth. This has been true elsewhere in Canada and, indeed, worldwide, but has not always been as explosive or as visible as in Quebec. At the beginning of 1973, only eighteen groups were known in Quebec, six English-speaking and twelve French-speaking. By the time of the bi-lingual conference held at Loyola that summer, there were fifty groups; 4,000 attended the conference. One year later an entirely French-speaking conference in Quebec City drew 6,500 and 400 groups existed. In 1977 about 40,000 gathered in the Olympic Stadium in Montreal for the closing session of a conference, with about half of them probably to be counted as actively involved in the renewal. By 1979 there were some 822 groups in the province with a membership of over 38,000 

This rapid growth has been attributed to the sort of changes that had been taking place in the society and church of Quebec during the Sixties and Seventies. Before the Second Vatican Council, Quebec had begun its own Quiet Revolution. Schools and hospitals and other social services had been, if not exactly secularized, at least thoroughly democratized. A clear pattern of life characteristic of a rural and religious society shifted and changed; the clerically dominated cultural monolith that had been perceived as Quebec gave way to a sort of secular pluralism. The religious practice fell dramatically. Then came the renewal, and it has been argued that the charismatic conversion, working within a framework in which the Church has lost a major part of its power to control and to constrain, enabled a body, which had been held down, to pull itself together, recognize its own reality and become free. 

It is always a mistake, however, to attribute too much influence to particular causes in order to explain an event that is much broader. By 1979 there were probably about 500 prayer groups outside of Quebec with some 20,000 members.  In proportion to the Catholic population that is not much different from the experience of Quebec, but less visible because so widely spread. 

In Atlantic Canada, the renewal started in the summer of 1970 in both Cape Breton and Prince Edward Island. Father John McLeod, who was the pastor of New Waterford in Cape Breton visited Ann Arbor and returned to start a group in his parish. At about the same time Fathers Joe Kane and Fred Miller, O.M.I., gave a retreat to the Sisters of St. Martha in Charlottetown. They offered an ecumenical session for the clergy and opened their evening services to clergy and laity. Among those who attended were Father Faber MacDonald, now Bishop of Grand Falls, Newfoundland, and Father Gerry Tingley

In 1971, in Halifax, some people who wanted to learn to pray went to ask Archbishop Hayes for help. By that time he had heard of developments in Charlottetown, so he invited Fathers Faber MacDonald, Gerry Tingley and Ted Butler to Halifax to meet with some people at his residence. A small group then began to meet at each other's homes until they moved to St. Thomas Aquinas Church. 

 In the fall of 1973, beginnings were made in Newfoundland and New Brunswick. A leadership session was held in Charlottetown and Father Phil Lewis came from Newfoundland to see what was going on. He went back to start a group in his parish in Freshwater, near Placentia.  In Saint John, New Brunswick, Father Bill Comerford

C.Ss.R., had invited Faber MacDonald and Gerry Tingley from Prince Edward Island, and from that came the first English-speaking group in New Brunswick. In November 1973, Father Oscar Melanson started a French-speaking group at the Maison Ste. Croix in St. Joseph, New Brunswick. 

Again we may glance at a couple of features of the renewal in Atlantic Canada. One has to do with structures and represents a common problem and development. The other is the involvement of Bishops in the renewal; this may be seen as remarkable, to begin with, but becoming more common. 

The renewal has been remarkably free from structures. It has recognized the authority of the Bishops, but apart from that no one really has any sort of effective control beyond the limits of a local group. Still, some sort of structure is needed to arrange conferences and to provide leadership in other ways. The leadership session held in Charlottetown in 1973 was intended to lead to the formation of an Atlantic Pastoral Committee. One was formed but was allowed to drop the following year when it became obvious that the concept was not generally acceptable. In 1976, another leadership meeting at Halifax led to the founding of the Atlantic Service Committee, the change of title being expressive of a somewhat diminished role. This Committee has organized conferences at Charlottetown, Halifax, Moncton, St. John's, Antigonish, and Sackville. 38 Similar structures exist in the Western Provinces, Ontario and Quebec, with the latter one probably exercising the most directive role. 

Archbishop James Hayes of Halifax is the only Canadian Bishop to have been personally involved in the initiation of the renewal in his diocese. When he attended the 1972 International Conference at Notre Dame, he was one of only three bishops present. Since that time, one of the notable features of the renewal in Canada has been the active interest and involvement in it of the bishops of all regions. They are present in numbers at every regional conference and have not hesitated to speak out in support of the renewal. 

In April 1975, the Canadian Bishops issued a message on the charismatic renewal addressed to all Canadian Catholics. This was extraordinary not only in its solemn character, being the common statement of all the bishops rather than merely a document of some commission or committee, but also in the way in which the bishops spoke in favor of the renewal and at the same time pointed out some negative aspects with a voice that seemed to come from within the renewal itself rather than from the sort of prudent distance adopted by most such statements down to that time. In this, the statement of the Canadian Bishops differed from those of their American brothers in 1969 and later in 1975, both of which were more cautious and reserved, and differed, indeed, from the statement some of their own number had issued the previous year.


The charismatic renewal in the Catholic Church in Canada is still a very recent phenomenon. I have no doubt that it is a work of the Holy Spirit for the renewal of the Church, but for the final effects of such action, we must wait with patience and acceptance upon the Lord. I have tried to give an account of the origins of the renewal and touch on some significant features. Many aspects have, perforce, been left undeveloped. Such development as the formation of covenant communities is obviously important, but it has seemed to me at once too complex and too recent to be taken up here. 

In some areas of the country active membership in the renewal seems to have declined in the past few years. In others, it has just about held steady. And in some, it is still growing rapidly. Many of the leaders have expressed concern about such aspects as the need for sound teaching, the slowness of new leaders in emerging, and especially the frustration of the 'swinging door syndrome'. It is easy to understand such concerns, yet it seems to me important not to exaggerate them. There are probably about 60,000 Canadian Catholics now actively involved in prayer groups while perhaps the total who have been so involved over the time since the renewal began here would be five times that many or more. That is the result of the 'swinging door'; but should this be seen mainly as a matter for concern or as a reason for praising God? In its own best self-understanding, the charismatic renewal has always seen itself not as a movement destined to grow ever strong and clearer in its own self-identity but as a weak instrument chosen by God to be filled with his power in order to bring about, and to disappear before, the renewal of the whole Church. In this context, the 'swinging door' may come to be seen as moved by the wind of the Holy Spirit. In any case, full renewal is still to be achieved and we can only pray to the Father, through his Son, Jesus Christ our Lord, to let his Spirit come now, with a mighty wind and tongues of fire, as at a New Pentecost

References at the link below

https://www.erudit.org/en/journals/sessions/1983-v50-n1-sessions1827479/1007048ar.pdf


James HANRAHAN, C.S.B. ( OBIT)

https://www.legacy.com/ca/obituaries/theglobeandmail/name/thomas-hanrahan-obituary?pid=189956685


Short Story was written by an Evangelical Pastor and friend of Father Joe Kane O.M.I. 
( I am searching for his name )
https://teresa-httpsitesgooglecomsitefaithful.blogspot.com/p/a-sharing-venture-by-evangelical.html


Sunday, May 29, 2022

I saw a mob; it wasn’t truckers, ANNA FARROW, CATHOLIC REGISTER SPECIAL

I am still angry at the way so many Canadians even Catholics ( I kid you not ) were so negative in regard to the Freedom Convoy. I will never understand the mob mentality of so many Ottawans. The hatred and lies from many of our political leaders and the so-called mainstream media still haunt me. Prime Minister Trudeau and NDP leader Jagmeet Singh and Mayor Watson were disgraceful. I hope someday they will be held accountable for their liesand scapegoating but I won't hold my breath
Maureen

I saw a mob; it wasn’t truckers

BY  ANNA FARROW, CATHOLIC REGISTER SPECIAL
  • January 31, 2022

 https://www.catholicregister.org/opinion/guest-columnists/item/33985-i-saw-a-mob-it-wasn-t-truckers


A true mob is terrible to witness, much less get stuck in. Something happens when humans are pressed together in fear and anger: a feral scent is emitted, an emboldening and anxious spirit. Once unleashed, it crashes over and draws down all in its wake.

If I told you two things about my weekend — that I was on Parliament Hill, and that I experienced such a mob — what would you conclude? Well, I did witness a mob, but it wasn’t on Parliament Hill.

On Parliament Hill, I saw hundreds of Canadian flags and an incredibly diverse cross-section of Canadians. Imagine guys wearing hunting camo and an odd group of white Boomers trying to drum. Throw in some Sikhs, a lot of little kids all wrapped up in snowsuits and an enormous crowd of Quebecers. Imagine them standing around in delight and bemusement, looking at each other and saying, “Hello? Do I know you? Is that you, Canada?”

For the record, I did not see one Confederate flag or swastika. Middle-aged ladies were draped in Trump 2024 regalia, but they were one fewer than the three counter-protestors holding #FLUTRUCKKLAN signs. Both groups seemed to be looking for friends but hadn’t found them.

There were lots of trucks. And honking that went late into Saturday night, which, if you know Ottawa, you will understand meant it tapered off about 9:30 p.m.

We overheard conversations. One Quebecer, behind us in a vast stream waiting to join the Wellington Street crowds, said, “I never imagined I would ever feel so united to ‘les Anglos’; it is a symbiosis.”

We saw lots of signs. One teenage girl’s said: “I lost my graduation; I lost my prom; Trudeau, you lost nothing.”  The police, while we wandered around, did not seem concerned or on guard. I read this morning not one arrest was made.

When I returned to the house, and my fingers had thawed, I turned to Twitter on my phone. I learned that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his family were whisked away for safety; that the CBC was speculating the Freedom Convoy was directed by Russian operatives; that a former press officer for Stephen Harper deleted her account after being hounded for tweeting that the day’s events felt like a happy Canada Day; that NDP leader Jagmeet Singh tweeted, “today Conservative MPs have endorsed a convoy led by those that claim the superiority of the white bloodline and equate Islam to a disease.”

Say, what? I felt like a cartoon character giving its head a shake. The friend I went to Ottawa with is the daughter of a Trinidadian-Canadian. She stared as I read out Singh’s words. I felt a little sick. There, on my phone, was the mob.

Sunday morning, we joined a group reciting the Rosary on the Hill. The sky above Parliament was  brilliant blue. The air horn noise nearly deafening. When I closed my eyes for the first decade, just a few of us were gathered. When I opened my eyes, at least 25 stood in a circle. Some joined all the prayers, some only the Our Father. Others stood quietly with us, observing and serious.

I thought of, and prayed for, two Indigenous women interviewed for a video clip earlier in the week. They were beside the road awaiting the convoy. When a reporter asked why they were in the cold with their drums, cheering for the truckers, they spoke of the divisions in their community over vaccine mandates. They spoke of inability to access the health clinic because of vaccine status, of limits placed on travel to visit family and friends. One put her hand to her chest to steady herself and said, “We are unable to attend Round Dances in our community.” The pain in her face and voice is hard to witness.

Whatever you read about the Freedom Convoy, whatever your stance on vaccine mandates and passports, know this: the narrative being spun that the convoy is a fascist, white supremacist movement is a bald-faced political lie.

Seeing those crowds, hearing those voices equally frustrated and hopeful, the words from the Prophet Hosea came to mind, “For they sow the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind.” Our political leaders are currently “sowing the wind.” I worry about the whirlwind.

Catholics across the country, from Salmon Arm, B.C., to Montreal, have spent the last frigid weeks standing outside to attend Mass. Those sweet women, wrapped in blankets, waited beside the road to show support for the convoy. On Sunday morning, we stood beside the Centennial Flame, the fountain that does not freeze in winter, to ask for the intercession of Our Lady of Canada. We may be outside, in the cold, but we refuse to be divided.

Notre Dame Du Cap, pray for us!

(Farrow is a Montreal writer who helped organize the first outdoor prayer services following the closure of Quebec churches in December.)