Wednesday, July 26, 2023

The Church Exists to Evangelize

 The Church Exists to Evangelize

From Pope Benedict

https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/church-exists-to-evangelize-6727

from the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops

https://www.usccb.org/beliefs-and-teachings/how-we-teach/new-evangelization/disciples-called-to-witness/disciples-called-to-witness-part-ii

Pope Paul VI's Call for Evangelization

Ten years after the close of the Second Vatican Council and a year after the 1974 Synod of Bishops, Pope Paul VI issued Evangelii Nuntiandi. Pope Paul VI stated that the Church “exists in order to evangelize, that is to say in order to preach and teach, to be the channel of the gift of grace, to reconcile sinners with God, and to perpetuate Christ’s sacrifice in the Mass, which is the memorial of his death and glorious Resurrection.”16 Evangelii Nuntiandi describes the essential aspects of evangelization as well as its effects on the one evangelizing and the one being evangelized. The proclamation of the Kingdom of God and salvation for all people through Jesus Christ is at the very core of the Church’s mission and the essential aspects of evangelization.17 To evangelize, one bears witness to God’s Revelation in Jesus through the Holy Spirit by living a life imbued with Christian virtues, by proclaiming unceasingly that salvation is offered to all people through the Paschal Mystery of Christ, and by preaching hope in God’s love for us.18 Pope Paul VI recognized that the first proclamation of the Good News is directed ad gentes. However, he also recognized the need for the evangelization of the baptized who no longer practice their faith.19 He called upon the Church to evangelize these two groups, to invite them to a life of conversion, and to add new meaning to their life through the Paschal Mystery of Christ.

Blessed John Paul II and the New EvangelizationA New Evangelization, new in its ardor, methods, and expression

Blessed John Paul II renewed the call to all of the Christian faithful to evangelize in the spirit of the Second Vatican Council and Pope Paul VI. “No believer in Christ, no institution of the Church can avoid this supreme duty: to proclaim Christ to all peoples.”20 Blessed John Paul II made evangelization a focus of his pontificate and emphasized man’s need to be evangelized by the Church. Evangelization occurs most effectively when the Church engages the culture of those she evangelizes. In 1983, he addressed the Catholic bishops of Latin America in Haiti and called for a New Evangelization: “The commemoration of the half millennium of evangelization will gain its full energy if it is a commitment, not to re-evangelize but to a New Evangelization, new in its ardor, methods and expression.”21 This marked the first time Blessed John Paul II used the term “New Evangelization” as the theological concept of proclaiming the Gospel anew to those already evangelized. He called for new “ardor, methods and expression” of evangelization, ones that engage the present-day culture and modern man. Blessed John Paul II, in the encyclical Redemptoris Missio, provided three circumstances in evangelization: (1) preaching to those who have never heard the Gospel (ad gentes), (2) preaching to those Christian communities where the Church is present and who have fervor in their faith, and (3) preaching to those Christian communities who have ancient roots but who “have lost a living sense of the faith, or even no longer consider themselves members of the Church, and live a life far removed from Christ and his Gospel. In this case what is needed is a ‘new evangelization’or a ‘re-evangelization.’”22 Blessed John Paul II alluded to the New Evangelization again in his opening address to the Catholic bishops of Latin America in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, as well as in Crossing the Threshold of Hope. Although Blessed John Paul II did not develop a full theological scheme of the New Evangelization, his writings reveal central themes of the New Evangelization, including the implementation of the call of the Second Vatican Council to proclaim the Good News of Christ by the engagement of the present culture and to accompany individuals on their journey from this life to eternal life. For Blessed John Paul II, evangelization must proclaim the Good News, which when appropriated into one’s life, leads to conversion. This conversion provides a life of witness to the Good News and compels one to fulfill his or her vocation to the universal call of holiness. One’s vocation to holiness is strengthened through the gifts of the Church, namely the grace of the sacraments, prayer, Scripture, and the Church’s teachings and traditions.

Pope Benedict XVI and the Future of the New Evangelization

New Evangelization is first and foremost a personal profound experience of GodDuring his homily on the Solemnity of SS. Peter and Paul at the Basilica of St. Paul Outside the Walls on June 28, 2010, Pope Benedict XVI renewed the Church’s call to the New Evangelization. Pope Benedict XVI called for the riproporre (“re-proposing”) of the Gospel to those regions “still awaiting a first evangelization” and to those regions where the roots of Christianity are deep but that have experienced “a serious crisis” of faith due to secularization.23 He clarified that the New Evangelization is new, not in its content but rather in its inner thrust; new in its methods that must correspond to the times; and new because it is necessary to proclaim the Gospel to those who have already heard it.24 Pope Benedict XVI calls the Church to evangelize by entering into dialogue with modern culture and confronting the cultural crisis brought on by secularization. To aid the Church in re-proposing the faith to modern society, Pope Benedict XVI established the Pontifical Council for the Promotion of the New Evangelization on September 21, 2010, and proposed that the New Evangelization be the focus of the next Synod of Bishops.

When describing why he created a council for the promotion of the New Evangelization, Pope Benedict XVI stated that the mission of the Church has always remained the same, but the cultural contexts confronting man and the Church have changed. The council will help the Church understand the cultural contexts of the twenty-first century. Pope Benedict XVI noted that the Church is being challenged by “an abandonment of the faith—a phenomenon progressively more manifest in societies and cultures which for centuries seemed to be permeated by the Gospel.”25 He also outlined the modern cultural factors, such as secularism, that are contributing to the decline of the Christian identity in the world. Pope Benedict XVI has also indicated that the New Evangelization is not a single formula meant for all circumstances; first 

The Legion of Mary and the New Evangelization 

https://sites.google.com/site/faithfulcatholics/Home/evangelize-evangelize-evangelize/legion-of-mary/legion-of-mary-archives/the-legion-of-mary-and-the-new-evangelization

World Youth Day and Converting Everyone to Christ - Bishop Robert Barron - commenting on a statement made by Bishop Américo Aguiar



Awesome Bishop Barron and thank you. The Church exists to Evangelize. As Disciples of Jesus, this is our Mission. As a mother, a grandmother, and a great-grandmother I find his statements a statement made by Bishop Américo Aguiar disheartening, to say the Least and somewhat depressing

https://www.wordonfire.org/articles/barron/world-youth-day-and-converting-everyone-to-christ/

World Youth Day and Converting Everyone to Christ - 

Bishop Robert Barron 

You have probably heard by now that a statement made by Bishop Américo Aguiar has caused quite a stir. Aguiar is the auxiliary bishop of Lisbon, Portugal, and he is the chief coordinator of the upcoming World Youth Day. Moreover, he was, in a very surprising move, just named a cardinal by Pope Francis. So he is a man of considerable weight—which is one reason why his remarks have gotten so much attention. He commented, in reference to the international gathering over which he is presiding, “We want it to be normal for a young Catholic Christian to say and bear witness to who he is or for a young Muslim, Jew, or of another religion to also have no problem saying who he is and bearing witness to it, and for a young person who has no religion to feel welcome and to perhaps not feel strange for thinking in a different way.” The observation that excited the most wonderment and opposition was this: “We don’t want to convert the young people to Christ or to the Catholic Church or anything like that at all.” I will admit that the remark of his that disturbed me the most, however, was this one: “That we all understand that differences are a richness and the world will be objectively better if we are capable of placing in the hearts of all young people this certainty,” implying that fundamental disagreement on matters of religion is good in itself, indeed what God actively desires. Lots of Catholics around the world have been, to put it mildly, puzzled by the cardinal-elect’s musings.  

for the remainder of Bishop Barron's article 

https://www.wordonfire.org/articles/barron/world-youth-day-and-converting-everyone-to-christ/


Tuesday, July 25, 2023

Medical resident says hospital left baby to die after failed abortion

 https://www.liveaction.org/news/medical-resident-hospital-baby-die-failed-abortion/


The following is adapted from a letter to the editor of Live Action News.

I am an Emergency Medicine resident in [redacted for privacy]…. While on my OB/GYN rotation at an outside hospital, a woman experiencing a failed abortion came to the hospital. The mom had [an abortion injury] and they transferred her to the hospital. While there, she ended up going into labor. She was 21-23 weeks along when she delivered a beautiful baby girl.

The staff expected the baby to “expire” immediately, but she began crying.

I walked into my night shift, and the baby lay in a bassinet alone. I asked who the cute baby was, and this is when I was told “it” was an abortion attempt and they were just waiting on “it” to die.

THE ATTENDING DOCTOR CLAIMED “PALLIATIVE CARE IS MEDICAL CARE” – AND LEFT THE BABY TO DIE

For the extent of my rotation, the attending OB/GYN doctor criticized pro-life states and talked about how she is working for legislation to have better ‘abortion care.’ She claimed that “palliative care is medical care” based on the law — and when when the baby was born alive, she did nothing. She did not call pediatrics or a rapid response but stated the baby was an abortion attempt and unwanted, so she would provide palliative care to satisfy the law that requires medical care to be provided.

I picked up the baby and was berated by one of the residents, who instructed me to “put it back because the nurses need to keep checking on it to document when it dies.” I declined, and sat there crying for the remainder of the subsequent sign-out and shift. I was helpless and there was nothing I could do. She had already been alive at that point a few hours, but without respiratory support, I knew she already was experiencing organ failure.

When an unrelated medical emergency caused the entire OB team to rush to the OR, I was an emergency resident just there for my 10 deliveries as required by my program, so I took the baby to a room alone, prayed over her, and sang to her.

The Lord gave me the name “Ada” for the baby, which I later learned means “adornment.” Ada died a few hours later.

I put her back in the bassinet, and she was referred to as “dead baby” by many of the nurses throughout the night. The attending doctor who came on night shift later officially pronounced her dead and remarked, “She could have been president” — making me wonder if she, too, was possibly pro-life.

In my mind, Ada was mine. Even though I’m a single female still in training, I had every intention of adopting her if she had survived.

I often think about the baby’s mom, too, who heard her baby cry before they rushed the baby from the room. She was later discharged after being treated for complications. I know she is likely suffering, and was left without any support or counseling.

“THEY THREW THE SIMULATION BABY ACROSS THE ROOM”

I don’t think people realize that these types of situations are happening even in our hospitals. This little girl clearly looked like a baby. I don’t understand how anyone could see her and do nothing.

Some time later, we participated in a training simulation for peri-mortem c-sections. By definition, this is performed on women with viable pregnancies “to save the mother” by diverting blood flow away from the uterus and to her other organs. While practicing, all my colleagues were joking that you get the baby from the uterus and “throw it away” because “we don’t care about a fetus and only want to focus on helping the mom.” They even took the simulation baby and threw it across the room. Again, this procedure is performed on viable babies who could be 24 or even 39 weeks!

I was pretty quiet after this all happened, trying to keep my emotions in check while thinking about Ada — and was essentially chased down the hallway by some fellow residents who lectured me to not let my politics influence patient care, which I found ironic.

I’m hoping Ada’s story can shine light on what’s happening every day, with these sorts of things done even by medical professionals.

Editor’s Note: This story has been adapted and is being published anonymously for the safety and privacy of the author.

Salt + Light Media presents WALKING TOGETHER: INTO ONE BEAT,

  

Salt + Light Media presents

WALKING TOGETHER: INTO ONE BEAT,

a documentary on Pope Francis’ historic penitential pilgrimage

of healing and reconciliation to Canada, exactly one year ago

 

Documentary premieres

Thursday, July 27, 2023, 8 p.m. ET / 5 p.m. PT

on Salt + Light TV

 

Watch official trailer at https://slmedia.org/into-one-beat 

Friday, July 21, 2023

Run With Life: Canadians euthanized at home, then transported to hospital for lung donation

This is as sick as it gets. Canada has become a House of Horrors

Run With Life: Canadians euthanized at home, then transported to ...: If you ou thought MAID was as bad as it could get, you would be wrong. We are also transplanting the organs of people killed in hospitals. Next step: allowing those euthanized at home to be transferred to the hospital to harvest their organs. 

This is from the Canadian Medical Association: Deceased organ and tissue donation after medical assistance in dying: 2023 updated guidance for policy

"In a case in Ontario, the patient received the MAiD procedure at home.16 When the family was ready, the patient was transferred to an ambulance, where death was confirmed. Intubation was performed and an orogastric tube was secured [This is to empty the contents of the stomach of the dead person] before the patient was placed prone on the ambulance stretcher. The rest of the protocol for lung protection during the absence of circulation was applied before the patient was transferred to the hospital for organ recovery.17

(16. Organ donation after medical assistance in dying (MAID) has only been possible for patients having the MAID procedure performed at a hospital facility due to prohibitive warm ischemic times. Herein, we describe a protocol for lung donation following MAID at home and demonstrate excellent postoperative outcomes. Lung donation following MAID at home is possible and should be considered by transplant programs.)

Note these troubling remarks in the guidelines:

"This guidance does not address the ethics of MAiD, questions regarding eligibility or assessment for MAiD, or provision of MAiD. It focuses on organ donation for those patients who have been assessed and found eligible for MAiD through established processes in Canada." (emphasis added)

And this:

"international experience with donation after MAiD is limited, and therefore, we found limited data to inform our recommendations. There was potential bias among forum participants, given that they were generally supporters of the current deceased donation and transplantation system, as well as donation after MAiD. (emphasis added)

Of course there was bias in this exercise, since everyone involved were MAID supporters, including MAID patients and family partners who were included as participants for the forum.

Yet strangely, the authors actually do mention the ethical challenges of organ donation after MAID:

"The purpose of this updated guidance is to continue to inform the development of policies and practices of donation after MAiD. This will help clinicians navigate the medical, legal and ethical challenges that arise when they support patients pursuing donation after MAiD."

So how do we manage to kill someone at home, and successfully extract their lungs for transplant? Well, we have a flow chart for that:

1) First we kill the patient. Make sure patient is dead.

2) Paramedics transfer (dead) patient to the ambulance.

3) Next we pump the (dead) patient's stomach to remove messy contents. Reconfirm (dead) patient is dead. 

4) Inflate lungs. 

5) Reconfirm (dead) patient is dead. (Do this multiple times. Just to make sure dead patient is truly dead. Just to be sure.)

6) Transfer (dead) patient to hospital.

7) Recover lungs at hospital.

Wednesday, July 19, 2023


 

Trudeau Insults Muslims

And he also insults Christians ( mainly Catholics ) as well as calling us among other things "far-right enemies of the LGBTQ Community ) which is a blatant lie

"Most thinking parents of any color or creed would resist LBGQT indoctrination being taught and celebrated to a captive audience of their children in state schools." It is sickening that our Prime Minister is constantly making outrageous statements in order to vilify everyone he doesn't agree with ( Freedom Convoy, Pro LIfers, Pro "protection of our children from sexual exploitation ) The sexualization of our children is going on everywhere and the worst of it is that it is happening within our Education System as well as within the Medical Profession. And if you dare oppose this abuse, you are a radical far-right white supremacist spreading hatred. You can even be arrested, kicked out of school, or fired from your place of employment as we know, Wake up people for the sake of our children! 

https://epaper.nationalpost.com/article/281509345666071

Monday, July 17, 2023

Anti-Catholicism is the Last Acceptable Bigotry

A State of Parental Dysphoria -

my thoughts: "It is so sad to see what our young people and parents are going through. I don't think I have ever seen anything so evil  (except perhaps abortion) as this trans indoctrination of our children who have been brainwashed by a society that is morally sick. God doesn't make mistakes; nobody is born in the wrong body. Why are so many boys deciding they want to be girls and vice versa with girls. It is absolutely unbelievable that instead of receiving much-needed help from professionals such as doctors, psychologists teachers, these so-called professionals are affirming these delusions. What an absolute nightmare for parents and other family members This is a disgrace and undoubtedly will eventually be seen as a very dark time in history" Maureen

 https://quillette.com/2023/07/06/a-state-of-parental-dysphoria/

They say it takes a village to raise a child. What happens when that ‘village’ tries to convince your autistic daughter she was ‘born in the wrong body’?

Anonymous

The author is a parent in British Columbia and a member of the group Parents with Inconvenient Truths about Trans.

I suffer from parental dysphoria.

Parental dysphoria is a new condition, growing in prevalence as the transgender trend that is indoctrinating our children picks up steam. Specifically, it’s the discomfort with your sense of self and view of reality that results from your child’s sudden announcement that he or she is transgender. Parental dysphoria commonly results from the immense societal pressure to unquestioningly support your child’s “gender journey,” up to and including social transition to the opposite gender (or non-binary identity), wrong-sex hormones, and surgeries.

Parental dysphoria involves the extended state of having to stay silent about something that you know will lead to tragedy, because you don’t want to lose your child, your friends, your extended family, and your marriage—everything you’ve worked to build. You do this to preserve some small chance of having an impact, to keep your child close enough to eventually help them find their way out of this delusion. It’s living with fear—fear of loss, fear of estrangement, fear of losing your own mind, fear of losing your integrity by denying your own instincts. Those who suffer from this condition, myself included, know this to be the most awful feeling you’ve ever experienced in your life.

If you suffer from parental dysphoria, you wish to say, “You were not ‘born in the wrong body’—that’s impossible.” But you also know your child wants so badly to believe this that you aren’t sure whether to lie or tell the truth about how you see things. So, instead, you say very little and pray every day that your child will find peace in their own body before it is too late, before your child denies and destroys their own sexual function and fertility, and poisons their body with synthetic hormones.

It’s the tears you choke back as you do your best to support your child despite their best efforts to push you away. It’s holding your breath, not even knowing how you can carry on. It’s a feeling of hopelessness you have never felt before.

It’s the horror of being told by your other child, the one who serves as the pronoun police in your home, that you are the one who isn’t loving and supportive. It’s the shame of realizing that you’ve lost your ability to be the adult in the room. It’s feeling that the liberal, progressive values you instilled in your children are being used against you in a way you could never have seen coming. It’s disheartening, destabilizing, and destructive.

Parental dysphoria is what follows when you’re advised by a professional to call your child by a new name, one that represents to you a symbol of their deep pain, a name that is more likely to have its origins in Pokémon than in the family heritage you tried to pass on to them.

It’s the dissonance of having to validate a decision to transition at school made by a child going through a confusing and difficult time in their life. It’s the out-of-body experience of hearing your child say, “I am not the person you raised—I am someone else entirely.” It’s the loneliness of being the only person who thinks all of this is damaging to your child, rather than it being “brave” and “liberating.”

It’s insane, actually, this parental dysphoria. It’s insane to live with and to live through. It makes you gradually lose your own tether to reality, bit by bit, day by day.

We should all want to know why so many kids are declaring a trans identity. We should not simply accept this as normal, and we should certainly not teach it, nor enshrine it into law, until someone can demonstrate through unassailable longitudinal studies that any of it is valid in the first place. Many of these young people are being led astray by the very people who are supposed to protect them. Doctors and psychologists are no longer experts to be trusted.

Teachers and schools have not only betrayed their most vulnerable students by encouraging them down a path of self-sacrifice but have also destroyed the sacred bond they hold with parents to ensure the healthy growth and development of their children.

To experience parental dysphoria is to be told you are wrong when you know your instincts come from the deepest place a mother can ever draw from—the instinct to protect her own child.

Our children, our friends, and our society are being groomed to believe a harmful ideology, and they aren’t even aware that this is happening. Even though it’s hard, I choose to treat my parental dysphoria rather than to live with, “affirm,” or “validate“ it. That means I must keep speaking up. I must never stop believing that my child’s dysphoria can be healed, as can my own; that this cultural phenomenon will pass, as all trends pass; and that our children will come back to us, hopefully all still in one piece.


The situation is especially bad for parents of children on the autism spectrum, parents like me who were trying to protect their already vulnerable child.

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) varies greatly from one child to the next, but common characteristics include black-and-white thinking, sensory challenges, and difficulties with interpreting social cues, processing language, planning, physical coordination, and proprioception. For girls on the spectrum, the process of menstruation can be extremely difficult to adjust to and manage, especially if extreme hormonal shifts, imbalances, or endometriosis accompany their monthly cycles. It is not uncommon for individuals on the spectrum to have digestion issues and food sensitivities that result in chronic stomach discomfort. Communication challenges associated with autism and poor mind-body connections can make it difficult for young people with ASD to articulate their physical symptoms. In a nutshell, there are many reasons why a teen with autism may feel uncomfortable with his or her body, even before introducing confusing concepts such as gender identity.

Children on the spectrum are especially vulnerable to a theoretical concept that suggests a person can be born in the wrong body and that identifying and transitioning to the opposite sex could relieve the individual from all the mental pain and physical discomforts they have been experiencing. Gender ideology conveniently avoids the obvious, that an individual’s biological sex cannot be changed and that medical interventions are purely cosmetic and come with health risks, many of which are still unknown due to lack of research.

As a child growing up in Canada, I benefited from the “village.” Before I started kindergarten, my retired neighbor read to me in English because my immigrant parents could not. The first time I ever put on a pair of ice skates or visited a museum was on a school field trip, and it was the librarian at my local public library who helped me fill out an application for a library card. These experiences complemented the efforts of my parents to positively impact my overall development.

Things are so different now. My child and I experienced a radically different village, a threatening one that actively sought to work against my efforts to protect and nurture my autistic daughter in her teen years.

This village interpreted her nonconformity to gender stereotypes, her quirkiness, and her same-sex attraction as things that needed to be fixed medically. In order to be part of the community, she needed to fit a specific box, even if that meant taking lifelong medications and undergoing multiple surgeries. Because she wasn’t mainstream, it wasn’t okay for her to stay in her natural state. Meanwhile, I accepted and loved her differences and wanted to give her time to see if she could love and accept those differences in herself.

The “village” turned on me, and tried to prevent me from fulfilling my responsibility to protect my daughter. The first stop was my daughter’s public school, where gender ideology was introduced into the anti-bullying/sex education curriculum, not as a theoretical concept but as fact. The school curriculum informed my vulnerable daughter that individuals who feel uncomfortable with their bodies, and whose preferences and behavioral traits fit the stereotypes of the opposite sex, are transgender.

The next stop was the medical community. After she learned of the concept of trans, and decided that it applied to her, we sought professional help. Every single one of the clinicians involved with my daughter instantly “affirmed” her self-diagnosis of being trans and her belief that she required testosterone and a double mastectomy to survive.

This was back in 2016–2017. The medical community not only dismissed my concerns about the risks involved and the lack of assessment inherent to the affirmation model, but also told me my questions were not supportive and were detrimental to my daughter’s mental health. The “village” was telling me I was wrong and negligent for trying to weigh the benefits against the risks, and for considering other less invasive methods of treatment.

I quickly learned that I could not safely ask questions about these procedures. Nor could I demand that these clinicians evaluate the root causes of my daughter’s distress and treat any coexisting conditions first, without the risk of having social-services officials become involved. Like the school system, the healthcare and social-services system further ingrained into my child the concept of “being born in the wrong body” and the need for medicalization.

At that time, the gender clinic inside the children’s hospital where my daughter was seen still acknowledged biological sex in their consent form for testosterone, making it clear that any medical interventions could only go so far, not to the point of literally changing a person’s sex. It included the following language: “Even though I think of myself partially or completely as male, I am genetically, biologically and physically female.” Today, the language in those consent forms no longer includes the words “male” and “female.” They now refer to “masculine” and “feminine” traits, resulting in even less clarity and less reasonable possibility of informed consent.

Even at the time of my daughter’s visits, important information was withheld from patients and their families before medical interventions were introduced. For example, none of the clinicians told me that, prior to the “affirmation” model, under the watchful-waiting approach to gender confusion, approximately 80 percent of patients with childhood gender dysphoria desisted and eventually accepted their biological sex; and that many, if not most, grew up to be gay, lesbian, or bisexual. This was kept from me even after I told them my daughter was unsure of her sexual orientation.

What does it say about a “village” that doesn’t allow such children to realize their sexual orientation naturally, knowing that many would otherwise grow up to be gay, lesbian, or bisexual?

I was also not informed of the documented overlap of gender dysphoria with autism and other coexisting conditions, despite the concerns I expressed about my daughter’s black-and-white thinking, immature social skills, and body dysmorphic comments. What does it say about a “village” that immediately accepts a teenage girl’s declaration that she is a boy without first considering whether she had experienced sexual trauma, suffered from an eating disorder or body dysmorphia, experienced painful periods, or was neurodiverse—or without first questioning or discussing any other potential causes of her distress?

It means the “villagers” have chosen to look away from the truth: that homophobia exists, that children and adult females are the predominant victims of sexual assault, that social media exacerbates body-image issues, that the medical community has not poured sufficient time and energy into researching gynecological issues such as endometriosis, and that some people’s brains just work differently.

Parents are undermined in other ways as well. There are cases of schools proceeding with the social transitioning of children despite the objections of parents who think a watchful-waiting approach is what their child needs. Parents who have not affirmed their child’s gender identity have had their child removed from their care, and two court cases in British Columbia ruled against parents objecting to the gender-affirming medicalization of their child due to prior mental-health concerns that had not been addressed under the affirmation model of care. The mainstream media further undermines parents by presenting affirmation as the only viable means by which a parent can show love and support, while at the same time refusing to report on the growing number of detransitioners.

It is hard to protect your child when the other “villagers” are holding your arms behind your back.

My daughter’s gender dysphoria gradually resolved without medical interventions over a two-year period, as she began to accept her bisexuality and learned how to better cope with the sensory and social challenges of autism. I shouldn’t have had to fight “the village” to allow my child time to do that.

This article was adapted from the newly published book, Parents with Inconvenient Truths about Trans: Tales from the Home Front in the Fight to Save Our Kids, edited by Josie A. and Dina S., with a Foreword by Stella O’Malley. Published by Pitchstone. Copyright © 2023 by Parents with Inconvenient Truths about Trans.